2 irreducible functions of the family:
Sex role theory: that
this theory holds thatgender roles are
4 functions of the family:
Functions have increased, not reduced:
quote a 1990 article in the ‘journal of marriage’. it states that mortality rate in:
agreed with Fit Thesis: the family evolved from extended ("promiscuous horde") to nuclear. but said it was to suit capitalism.
used Parish Records to conclude that:
were both common in pre-industrial societies (which disproves/critiques Engels' claim that these societies were polygamous and extended families)
"the general trend of Engels' argument still appears to be sound" because while in non-industrial societies, family appeared nuclear in
family is upheld as a place of love, separate from exploitation of capitalism. but really it cannot meet the psychological and personal needs of its members as they are tormented under capitalism.
pester power: refers to the power of children to use their parents' emotional connection to them, to persuade parents to buy expensive toys and brands.
children are aware of larger, 'cooler' brands that will increase their status. this supports the idea of 'pester power' where children engage in conspicuous consumption.
Developed Marx and Engels' theory of false class consciousness.
'Haven in a Heartless world'
the family is a haven or retreat from capitalism
both Lasch and Donzelot argue that while the family is genuinely a safe haven, it still is insufficient. There is a trend of invasion or interference with the family.
'Policing of Families'
safe and secure institution. freedom & self expression away from repressive, exploitative society.
both Lasch and Donzelot argue that while the family is genuinely a safe haven, it still is insufficient. There is a trend of invasion or interference with the family.
surveillance
routine state intervention via these fields:
the state exercises power through discipline. Discipline = the ability to conform to a norm of behaviour/performance. The knowledge base of society acts as a definer of this norm.
they are known as the 'thought police', comprising of:
this means that we end up explaining to lay experts (loosely: counselors and doctors) our own perceived inadequacies. This is called 'Confession'
state control is the mechanism through which the state advises and intervenes with personal lives, such as family life, eg. providing mandatory parenting lessons to parents of YO.
Differ from most radical feminists in that they focus on the material factors as the most important cause of oppression of women. Particularly in the arena of work, men are the main beneficiaries.
DRA (1969-71) liberated women previously trapped in empty shell marriages. Marriage as an institution has its roots in "outdated notions of ownership and immutable gender roles"
The family = an 'Anti-social unit'
This means that the family:
It does this through a strong ideology that upholds (patriarchal traditional nuclear) family life as the ideal way to live, such that every other way 'pales in comparison'. This oppresses women by ensuring they put up with domestic violence and dysfunctionality, in order to follow the norm.
'sexual politics' (1970) society organises itself so that men can dominate. (in extreme form, this takes place in Domestic Violence).
'The Sociology of Housework' (1974) 1960s: qualitative interviews with 40 housewives (20 mc; 20wc), all had at least 1 child under 5. All were aged 20-30s. Both classes had an 85:15 split with their partners on housework. 70% ="dissatisfied" with the amount of housework they did.
'Just like a girl' 1976 girls in 1970s wanted:
but by the 1990s, they wanted:
family = an "ideological conditioning device in an exploitative society"
Cooper also talked from a radical psychiatrist perspective.
family = designed to teach passivity not rebellion. it has an authoritarian ideology where women teach passivity to children and husbands.
"as an economic unit the nuclear family is a valuable stabilising force in capitalist society."
conjugal roles
'The symmetrical family' (1975) Bethnal Green, East End London couples study.
2 irreducible functions of the family:
Sex role theory: that
this theory holds thatgender roles are
criticises Parsons' sex role theory. He has no scientific evidence for the claim that gender rolesare biologically suited. His claims are sexist
Critiques Parsons' Sex role theory. It dichotomises and genders the qualities of reason and emotion. They are not in fact equally valued by wider society; reason is given patriarchal privilege over emotion, as per enlightenmentideas.
'The Sociology of Housework' (1974) 1960s: qualitative interviews with 40 housewives (20 mc; 20wc), all had at least 1 child under 5. All were aged 20-30s. Both classes had an 85:15 split with their partners on housework. 70% ="dissatisfied" with the amount of housework they did.
'The Sociology of Housework' (1974) 1960s: qualitative interviews with 40 housewives (20 mc; 20wc), all had at least 1 child under 5. All were aged 20-30s. Both classes had an 85:15 split with their partners on housework. 70% ="dissatisfied" with the amount of housework they did.
(2006) research based on data from The British Household Panel Survey. more than 2000 working women (single or cohabiting; with or without children). 15hr/week on housework when they cohabit; 10hr/week when single.
(2001) CHanges to the time spent on paid work hardly changes the time women spend on domestic labour.
(2008)
women and men spent similar time on gardening and pets. The only tasks on which men spent more time than women were car maintenance, and DIY.
Women are responsible for organising family 'quality time'. whereas men are more likely to obtain sustained blocks of this time.
(2005): both men and women benefit from marriage but men benefit more.
(2013) 'Emotion work'. Women perform emotional labour of:
(2007)
BSA (2012)
(2007)
(2011)
(1994)
(1996)
believe that it is the man's job to be the breadwinner, and the woman's to be the nurturer. This shows that there is a decline in the percentage of both genders believing in/accepting traditional Parsonian gender roles as legitimate. Therefore there is a march of progress away from these sexist, unequal notions.
gave 2 explanations for gender DoL:
both of these explanations support the liberal feminist or functionalist march of progress notion that with changing cultural attitudes and economic arrangements, men and women can progress towards symmetrical DoL.
younger men do more housework.
this supports Crompton and Lyonette's cultural explanation for DoL, since there is an age demographic factor in how much symmetry there is between couples, and this will improve over time, due to the younger couples continuing symmetrical arrangements in the future.
this shows that there is an improvement in cultural attitudes towards DoL in the younger generation, thus suggesting a trend towards symmetry.
couples are more likely to besymmetrical when their parents modelled equal relationships for them when younger. This shows that generationally, social attitudes can slowly change, especially since 72% of women work now, thus leading to them modelling more equal relationships for their children.
better-paid mc women are more able to buy labour-saving devices. (this supports Crompton and Lyonette's economic explanation for gender DoL).
argued there was no immediate chance of an equal DoL (symmetry), because there exists continued economic inequality.
report: 'home truths' (2002), authors = Jayatilaka and Rake
when men buy products for themselves, they spend more money than when women buy products for themselves.
(2003) 'a tale oftwo nations? Juggling work and home in the new economy'
when the man becomes unemployed, the woman takes control of spending and debt. (this supports the argument that unequal gender DoL is caused by economic inequality, however it also implies the functionalist solution of a 'march of progress' since it posits that if economic inequality is resolved, so will unequal gender DoL).
(1993)
corroborated Edgell's (outdated) 1980 study
key takeaway: the most egalitarian financial arrangement between couples was wife-controlled pooling, where there is a joint bank account, but the wide has more of a say on expenditure. This was also the second least common type, occuring in only 1/4 of households (27/102).
similar income = more egalitarian.
further details:
(1980) study (outdated) of financial power in middle class families.
found that men are responsible for the major decisions e.g. house, holiday, car.
and women for the minor decisions e.g. food, clothes.
argued for stratified diffusion, and therefore this gender inequality will seep down into the working classes as well.
overall this study provides further evidence for continued gender inequality in power and family decision-making, and while outdated, it is corroborated by Pahl (1993).
"power is the probability that the actor within a social relationship will be in a position to carry out his will despite resistance, regardless of the basis on which this probability rests."
radical psychiatrist and phenomenological psychiatrist (meaning only studies the family interactions when one member is schizophrenic.
Laing further argued that this harms wider society
'A Runaway World' (1967).
anthropologist - looking at small-scale pre-industrial family.
found it is part of a wide kinship unitwhich offers practical and psychological support for individuals.
Similar to Laing, Cooper argues the family destroys the inner self of a person, preventing the free adoption of the self. We are trapped in relationships based on love, which leads to self-other dependencies, meaning we don't exist independently of the validation we get from other family members. We have no creative environment for self-development, and so we don't develop independence or an independent concept of self. This leads to family members developing a need for love, which brings pleasure, but also becomes the basis for repression, guilt, and violence.
(1970) study ‘Sanity, Madness and the family’. Found that, in cases where 1 family member has been diagnosed with schiz0phrenia, in most of these cases it is an only child. And, most commonly, it is the daughter. They provide a Fr3udian explanation of this, that when the daughter gets a boyfriend, or stays out late, the parents start to suspect her of starting s3xu4l relationships. This leads to the parents taking out their unconscious inc3stuous desires out on her. This leads to the daughter withdrawing, behaving strangely, and assuming other identities. This is intially interpreted as a nervous breakdwon, but is later diagnosed as Schiz0phrenia.
Freud’s work has been widely discredited within Psychology, and so the use of it within Sociological and Radical Psychiatriac studies can be questioned/critiqued.
1980 study ‘Becoming a Parent’ explored how parents’ roles are defined and developed. Found that family life is a strong socialisation process for both the parents AND the children, and that it occurs through trial and error.
Also found that the images/perceptions that parents have of children, and the way they label what they perceive as ‘problems’ with a child’s behaviour, is based on reference to popular knowledge/understanding of ‘stages of child development’, and these collective understandings are built in order to help parents cope with the uncertainty of child development.
Note: this can be related to the work of Chris Jenks within the Childhood topic.
developed Laing's notion of reciprocal concern, by arguing that the son is emotionally locked into the nexus, and has reciprocal concern for what other members think about him. As such, if his father is ashamed of him, he can't just brush it off. The result is a potential for harm to his psyche.
This study/analysis adds further support to the radical psych argument that the nuclear family is harmful to members.
Haralambos also provides 2 important critiques:
Firstly, they critique Laing; there is no historical setting/contextualisation for Laing's argument. How has the family changed over time? Haralambos argues Laing's study would be better if it took a longitudinal study, and sample split of 50% families who see themselves as conflict-ridden, and 50% who do not see themselves as having conflict, and then see how mental illness develops in each family-type.
Secondly, they critique Laing and Leach both for ideological bias, since they see the family from their own specialised knowledge as phenomenological psychiatrist perspectives. This clouds their judgement, leading to an overly pathologised interpretation of familial conflict as necessarily a sign of mental illness.
(1975) Provides 3 critiques of Laing: 1-Ignores positives: Laing presents an unbalanced portrait, by only focusing on the ways family causes suffering; it ignores the harmonious and positive aspects of the family. 2-Ignores external socialising agents: Laing places almost exclusive focus on parent-child interaction; which paints parents as powerful socialising agents, and children as utterly powerless. This ignores the ways dchildren influence their parents, and the ways outside influences (e.g. school, siblings, social workers, peer groups, mass media etc) which also socialise children. Laing’s work is very much centred around only-children, ignoring siblings. 3-Ignores cultural factors and non-family institutions: The Laingian conceptualisation of family exists within a social vacuum. Laing universalises the family as the exclusive cause of mental illness and dysfunctionality. This ignores how cultural factors shape how we approach child-rearing practices; family life is affected by socio-structural factors like social class; and other institutions like media and education are also key in socialisation.
(2007) dv stats: Estimate that domestic violence (DV) stats are 140% higher than the British Crime Survey (BCS) suggests, because the BCS only records a maximum of 5 crimes per person, and DV is often a repeat-offence crime.
(2006) “the causes of d0mest1c violence are rooted in the issues of power, and control and the perpetrator’s sense of entitlement”
(2004/5) (dv stats) ‘Crime in England and Wales 2004/5’: Found domestic v10lence = 16% of all violent crimes. It has more repeat victims than any other crime, and is the largest cause of morbidity worldwide for women aged 19-4; a bigger killer of this demographic than war, cancer, and car accidents.
Compiled statistics: 1 child per week is killed by parent/carer (Home Office, 2004; Crime in Eng and Wales, 2002-3).6% of children experience frequent and severe emotional maltreatment. 18% of children experience some absence of care.
The ‘knowledge base’ of society (teachers, doctors, psychiatrists, social workers) are the ‘thought police’; they exercise power through ‘Discipline’. Discipline = the ability to conform to a norm of performance/behaviour. Wider society is very much involved in modern family ‘private life’. There is routine state intervention (by law, social work, social security, tax, and the welfare systems) serves to protect the m0nogamous nuclear family by controlling domestic life. These ‘lay experts’ act for the state when they intervene in domestic life; they question us, leading to ‘confession’. Confession si where we explain to lay experts like counselors and doctors, our perceived inadequacies, and our behaviours and emotions are corrected. 2 key foucauldian concepts here: ‘Discipline’ and ‘Confession’. The main argument is that the state exerts power and regulation over the family through ‘experts’ that control family life.
Estimates that domestic violence accounts for 16% of all violent crime. DV has more repeat victims than any other crime; on average a v1ctim is assaulted 35 times before they call the police.
The cost of DV in 2004 was roughly £23billion (costs might include: treatment for v1ctims, trials, shelters etc).
Navigation
feel free to support the developer of this site! buy me a kofi. link= "https://ko-fi.com/sic0"
2 irreducible functions of the family:
Sex role theory: that
this theory holds thatgender roles are
4 functions of the family:
Functions have increased, not reduced:
quote a 1990 article in the ‘journal of marriage’. it states that mortality rate in:
agreed with Fit Thesis: the family evolved from extended ("promiscuous horde") to nuclear. but said it was to suit capitalism.
used Parish Records to conclude that:
were both common in pre-industrial societies (which disproves/critiques Engels' claim that these societies were polygamous and extended families)
"the general trend of Engels' argument still appears to be sound" because while in non-industrial societies, family appeared nuclear in
family is upheld as a place of love, separate from exploitation of capitalism. but really it cannot meet the psychological and personal needs of its members as they are tormented under capitalism.
pester power: refers to the power of children to use their parents' emotional connection to them, to persuade parents to buy expensive toys and brands.
children are aware of larger, 'cooler' brands that will increase their status. this supports the idea of 'pester power' where children engage in conspicuous consumption.
Developed Marx and Engels' theory of false class consciousness.
'Haven in a Heartless world'
the family is a haven or retreat from capitalism
both Lasch and Donzelot argue that while the family is genuinely a safe haven, it still is insufficient. There is a trend of invasion or interference with the family.
'Policing of Families'
safe and secure institution. freedom & self expression away from repressive, exploitative society.
both Lasch and Donzelot argue that while the family is genuinely a safe haven, it still is insufficient. There is a trend of invasion or interference with the family.
surveillance
routine state intervention via these fields:
the state exercises power through discipline. Discipline = the ability to conform to a norm of behaviour/performance. The knowledge base of society acts as a definer of this norm.
they are known as the 'thought police', comprising of:
this means that we end up explaining to lay experts (loosely: counselors and doctors) our own perceived inadequacies. This is called 'Confession'
state control is the mechanism through which the state advises and intervenes with personal lives, such as family life, eg. providing mandatory parenting lessons to parents of YO.
The family = an 'Anti-social unit'
This means that the family:
It does this through a strong ideology that upholds (patriarchal traditional nuclear) family life as the ideal way to live, such that every other way 'pales in comparison'. This oppresses women by ensuring they put up with domestic violence and dysfunctionality, in order to follow the norm.
'sexual politics' (1970) society organises itself so that men can dominate. (in extreme form, this takes place in Domestic Violence).
Differ from most radical feminists in that they focus on the material factors as the most important cause of oppression of women. Particularly in the arena of work, men are the main beneficiaries.
DRA (1969-71) liberated women previously trapped in empty shell marriages. Marriage as an institution has its roots in "outdated notions of ownership and immutable gender roles"
'The Sociology of Housework' (1974) 1960s: qualitative interviews with 40 housewives (20 mc; 20wc), all had at least 1 child under 5. All were aged 20-30s. Both classes had an 85:15 split with their partners on housework. 70% ="dissatisfied" with the amount of housework they did.
'Just like a girl' 1976 girls in 1970s wanted:
but by the 1990s, they wanted:
family = an "ideological conditioning device in an exploitative society"
Cooper also talked from a radical psychiatrist perspective.
family = designed to teach passivity not rebellion. it has an authoritarian ideology where women teach passivity to children and husbands.
"as an economic unit the nuclear family is a valuable stabilising force in capitalist society."
studied USSR(1960) compared to Western capitalist economies.
conjugal roles
'The symmetrical family' (1975) Bethnal Green, East End London couples study.
2 irreducible functions of the family:
Sex role theory: that
this theory holds thatgender roles are
criticises Parsons' sex role theory. He has no scientific evidence for the claim that gender rolesare biologically suited. His claims are sexist
Critiques Parsons' Sex role theory. It dichotomises and genders the qualities of reason and emotion. They are not in fact equally valued by wider society; reason is given patriarchal privilege over emotion, as per enlightenmentideas.
'The Sociology of Housework' (1974) 1960s: qualitative interviews with 40 housewives (20 mc; 20wc), all had at least 1 child under 5. All were aged 20-30s. Both classes had an 85:15 split with their partners on housework. 70% ="dissatisfied" with the amount of housework they did.
(2006) research based on data from The British Household Panel Survey. more than 2000 working women (single or cohabiting; with or without children). 15hr/week on housework when they cohabit; 10hr/week when single.
(2001) CHanges to the time spent on paid work hardly changes the time women spend on domestic labour.
(2008)
women and men spent similar time on gardening and pets. The only tasks on which men spent more time than women were car maintenance, and DIY.
Women are responsible for organising family 'quality time'. whereas men are more likely to obtain sustained blocks of this time.
(2005): both men and women benefit from marriage but men benefit more.
(2013) 'Emotion work'. Women perform emotional labour of:
(2007)
BSA (2012)
(2007)
(2011)
(1994)
(1996)
believe that it is the man's job to be the breadwinner, and the woman's to be the nurturer. This shows that there is a decline in the percentage of both genders believing in/accepting traditional Parsonian gender roles as legitimate. Therefore there is a march of progress away from these sexist, unequal notions.
younger men do more housework.
this supports Crompton and Lyonette's cultural explanation for DoL, since there is an age demographic factor in how much symmetry there is between couples, and this will improve over time, due to the younger couples continuing symmetrical arrangements in the future.
this shows that there is an improvement in cultural attitudes towards DoL in the younger generation, thus suggesting a trend towards symmetry.
couples are more likely to besymmetrical when their parents modelled equal relationships for them when younger. This shows that generationally, social attitudes can slowly change, especially since 72% of women work now, thus leading to them modelling more equal relationships for their children.
better-paid mc women are more able to buy labour-saving devices. (this supports Crompton and Lyonette's economic explanation for gender DoL).
argued there was no immediate chance of an equal DoL (symmetry), because there exists continued economic inequality.
report: 'home truths' (2002), authors = Jayatilaka and Rake
when men buy products for themselves, they spend more money than when women buy products for themselves.
(2003) 'a tale oftwo nations? Juggling work and home in the new economy'
when the man becomes unemployed, the woman takes control of spending and debt. (this supports the argument that unequal gender DoL is caused by economic inequality, however it also implies the functionalist solution of a 'march of progress' since it posits that if economic inequality is resolved, so will unequal gender DoL).
(1993)
corroborated Edgell's (outdated) 1980 study
key takeaway: the most egalitarian financial arrangement between couples was wife-controlled pooling, where there is a joint bank account, but the wide has more of a say on expenditure. This was also the second least common type, occuring in only 1/4 of households (27/102).
similar income = more egalitarian.
further details:
(1980) study (outdated) of financial power in middle class families.
found that men are responsible for the major decisions e.g. house, holiday, car.
and women for the minor decisions e.g. food, clothes.
argued for stratified diffusion, and therefore this gender inequality will seep down into the working classes as well.
overall this study provides further evidence for continued gender inequality in power and family decision-making, and while outdated, it is corroborated by Pahl (1993).
"power is the probability that the actor within a social relationship will be in a position to carry out his will despite resistance, regardless of the basis on which this probability rests."
radical psychiatrist and phenomenological psychiatrist (meaning only studies the family interactions when one member is schizophrenic.
Laing further argued that this harms wider society
'A Runaway World' (1967).
anthropologist - looking at small-sclare pre-industrial family.
found it is part of a wide kinship unitwhich offers practical and psychological support for individuals.
please visit https://sociosite.neocities.org/phone for the phone version
David Lane
studied USSR(1960) compared to Western capitalist economies.